<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Philosophy on Angelo Canepa</title><link>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/category/philosophy/</link><description>Recent content in Philosophy on Angelo Canepa</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 21:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/category/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Stoicism</title><link>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2018/06/01/stoicism/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2018/06/01/stoicism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been avoiding the idea of Stoicism for a while, but the concept keeps reappearing over and over again.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;As a part of a series of philosophies from Hellenistic times, stoicism could be group together with skepticism and hedonism, the last two inspired in line with Socrates thought.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrismyers/2018/03/08/how-one-struggling-entrepreneur-found-solace-in-the-ancient-philosophy-of-stoicism/#18851453d06c"&gt;Forbes&lt;/a&gt;, an entrepreneur tells the story of a US veteran who was held prisoner by Vietnamese forces in the 60’s.  He used stoicism to overcome pain, memorizing the teachings from Epictetus’s book &lt;em&gt;The Enchiridion&lt;/em&gt; – translated means &lt;em&gt;The Handbook.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sense and Morality</title><link>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/11/18/sense-and-morality/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:30:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/11/18/sense-and-morality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every known science has started as open philosophy pursuit for the truth and the sportiveness of asking questions and wonder the what ifs. Eventually, those pursuits became establish sciences with more deepness and understanding in the studied subjects.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The lack of science in current philosophy dilemmas make me wonder if science would fill those gaps in a short and medium-term future and how it would look like.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The time in between where scientists will enter the scenes of today no sense – maybe they will never do – would generate loneliness and tremendous void among citizens of western society where development has changed or lives tremendously.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Debates: Are they leading to something?</title><link>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/11/04/debates-where-are-leading-out-today/</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 16:10:04 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/11/04/debates-where-are-leading-out-today/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Does not matter if you are interested in more rights to women or you prefer digital or analogue music players, debates are always a good way of getting our best arguments afloat and giving a second opinion to the counterpart. Also, means a battle of ideas – in a good way – where two parts of a particular society or mainstream collide with to two or more positions that are unchangeable over time.  Let’s take for example a controversial topic, Palestina &amp;amp; Israel.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Christianity &amp; Morality</title><link>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/05/05/christianity-morality/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 07:16:18 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/05/05/christianity-morality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Who remembers the following phrase?&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;figure&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.artandarchitecture.org.uk/images/gallery/fc830731.html"&gt;&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://new.angelocanepa.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Woman-taken-in-Adultery-Ortolano.jpg" alt="Woman taken in Adultery" width="320" height="265" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;Woman taken in Adultery (1524-27) &amp;#8211; Ortolano&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;&#10;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;‘Let anyone among you who is without sin cast the first stone’.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The painting at the right shows the exact moment when Jesus wrote in the ground those words. It is imperative to know what the Bible says about this event&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h3 id="john-753811"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;John 7:53–8:11&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&#10;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Then each of them went home,  while Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.  Early in the morning he came again to the temple. All the people came to him and he sat down and began to teach them.  The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery; and making her stand before all of them,  they said to him, ‘Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery.  Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?’  They said this to test him, so that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground.  When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, ‘Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.’  And once again he bent down and wrote on the ground. When they heard it, they went away, one by one, beginning with the elders; and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him.  Jesus straightened up and said to her, ‘Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?’ She said, ‘No one, sir.’ And Jesus said, ‘Neither do I condemn you. Go your way, and from now on do not sin again.’&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item><item><title>Free Will</title><link>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/03/19/free-will/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://new.angelocanepa.com/en/2017/03/19/free-will/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How free are we? Taking notice of different levels of free will, some scholars could argue we haven’t any.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The different levels of free will are referred to the different social constructs we live in. As a starting point, we have basic laws and morals, you can argue with that as a “constant” we could elaborate our own free will taking for granted the ethics &amp;amp; morals, for example, you can’t  murder or steal from a store,  taking one degree of freedom out.  Let’s say we accept this level of freedom, we will encounter another level, where we have personal and social constructs regarding our own identity and behavior, from here there are things that are completely legal but we don’t feel to make them because is not part of us. Another degree is diminished into the real freedom. But still, in terms of this constructs, we can decide right?.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>